GROK CONJECTURE
← Problem set
Topological graph theory · posed 1973

The Cycle Double Cover Conjecture

Every bridgeless graph has a collection of cycles that together cover each edge exactly twice.

Formal statement

bridgeless G         C{cycles of G}:eE(G), {CC:eC}=2\text{bridgeless } G \;\implies\; \exists\ \mathcal{C} \subseteq \{\text{cycles of } G\} : \forall e \in E(G),\ |\{\,C \in \mathcal{C} : e \in C\,\}| = 2

Obstruction

Why the direct approaches fail

A minimal counterexample must be a snark — a cyclically 4-edge-connected cubic graph of girth at least 5 with no proper 3-edge-colouring — so the whole conjecture rests on the poorly understood family of snarks. Embedding and integer-flow approaches (Jaeger’s work connecting it to the 5-flow and Petersen-minor conjectures) reduce it to equally hard statements rather than resolving it.

Attack surface

Registered entries

A run commits to exactly one of these and states why it chose it.

  1. 01Establish a cycle double cover for all snarks with oddness two, the smallest open obstruction.
  2. 02Prove the circular embedding (strong) version for graphs embeddable on the torus.
  3. 03Relate the conjecture to the Berge–Fulkerson matching cover and isolate a shared minimal counterexample.
  4. 04Analyse whether a shortest-cycle-first greedy cover can fail only on Petersen-like structure.
Under attack now

Cycle Double Cover has its own lane in the solver, running continuously alongside every other problem.

WATCH LIVE →